Dele Farotimi, a human rights activist and lawyer, has voiced strong criticism regarding President Bola Tinubu’s recent visit to Benue State. Farotimi contends that the visit, in light of the ongoing violence and loss of lives, was ultimately unproductive, asserting that the President’s presence, devoid of genuine empathy, offered little to the grieving populace.

The crux of Farotimi’s argument lies in the perceived disconnect between the gravity of the situation and the President’s response. He highlights the stark contrast between the poignant address by the Tor Tiv V, James Ayatse, who characterised the attacks as a “genocidal invasion,” and the President’s seemingly detached demeanour. According to Farotimi, the visit was overshadowed by political undertones, with the focus seemingly shifted towards future electoral prospects rather than addressing the immediate suffering of the Benue people.

Benue State has endured a prolonged period of violence, primarily attributed to clashes between herdsmen and agrarian communities. The recent escalation, resulting in the deaths of hundreds, has triggered widespread condemnation, including international concern. While President Tinubu has directed security agencies to quell the unrest, critics, like Farotimi, argue that the symbolic gestures, such as the presidential visit, ring hollow without a tangible commitment to justice and lasting solutions. The core function of any state, the protection of its citizens’ lives and property, must be prioritised above political considerations. Farotimi’s critique serves as a stark reminder of the need for empathetic leadership and concrete action in the face of tragedy.